Catholic Bishop Luigi Padovese Assassinated in Southern Turkey - International - Catholic Online

Catholic Bishop Luigi Padovese Assassinated in Southern Turkey - International - Catholic Online

Gone but not forgotten is the Bishop of Turkey recently murder by his driver who, for all supposed intent converted to Catholicism but in truth still served his master the devil. Bishop Luigi Padovese was murder by his driver after the driver learned that the faithful Bishop cancelled his trip to Cypress to meet with the Pope who issued his Instrumentum Laboris (Working documents http://www.apostolicvisitation.org/en/news/resources/InstrumentumLaboris.pdf) to the Churches of the Middle East.

Bishop Padovese was in fact the same Bishop who buried the recent victim of prejudice and Islamic hatred Fr Anrea Santoro whose death when he presided over in Trabozon Turkey. Fr Andrea Santoro, a Fidei Donum priest who was assinated in Trabzon Turkey in 2006.

This story was altogether ignored for the better part by CNN, Reuters,Associate Press and many of the other secular television media. It was posted as a single paragraph at best. Yet here was a Catholic Bishop killed by a Muslim extremist masquerading as a convert as he, Bishop Padovese did what he could to secure the safety of Pope Benedict XVI. Perhaps were the Bishop an American Citizen there might have been more coverage of it but even in that regard it is unlikely. The irony of much of the American life today is that many of the national enemies are Americans themselves much in the same way as a majority of the Church's worst enemies considered themselves either lapse Catholics or former Catholics who need to comfort their evil cynicism which is nothing more than the result of their total failure to comply with God’s decrees. Weakness in the flesh often leads to these dangerous quixotic crusaders to play out their tragic “my mommy took her breast from me too soon..”therapy sessions in public forums which no doubt they themselves have discovered to be worthless, good for nothing self loathing animus fit only to be slung out on the laps of their unsuspecting subscribers like a woman unpacking her heart on complete strangers the excrement of her own self deluded convultions.

Primacy of Truth over Power. St. Thomas More, Man for This Season - Living Faith - Home & Family - Catholic Online

Primacy of Truth over Power. St. Thomas More, Man for This Season - Living Faith - Home & Family - Catholic Online  

St. Thomas Moore has been canonized and respected as the Saint for Statesmen and Politicians.Certainly it would be best to send a copy of this man’s great integrity to Nancy Pelosi and the other so-called Catholics there on Capital Hill. However, it is a good thing to even recognize the value of integrity in ones actions particularly as a politician and in fact I believe that it is the Catholic Church alone that has such a saint or a veneration for the truth in it’s entirety. Certainly a dedication to the falsehood of abortion, contraception and homosexuality is a testament of a nation willing to live with a lie for the sake of comfort and convenience. 

What is not recommended is to hand out little awards in the name of this great saint certainly that would not be in accordance with his actions. As of yet however there are politicians and clergy whom I would like to send a reminder of what this great saint did as a reminder to maintain their integrity. Along with St. Aloysius(Luigi) Gonzaga whom the clergy and devoted pray to for purity (whom I will dedicate a separate posting) St. Thomas Moore is portends that kind of statesman like quality that we have not seen in quite sometime. Certainly the president does not have his qualities with all of his back room deal making. (For more on that go to my political blog  Freedom From Democracy.

Catholics Defend French Cathedral de Lyon During Homosexual 'Kiss-In' - International - Catholic Online

Homosexual protestors have really become an army of socially defiant enemies of the state. After they discard God and secular social convention they then proceed to lead people into a debate about the subject, stating “Who can it harm?”. Their very question is indicative that they have not the mental health to be perceived as psychologically healthy adults.

Constantly the homosexual groups look at African-American history in terms of racial segregation and even cases where in prison people have been allowed to marry (whether they were allowed to be married as same sex couples the article does not say.) and use these bastardized groups to lend legitimacy to their case which they believe people will allow because they are too afraid to mention the obvious.

African-Americans under slavery lived in bastardized sexual relationships, with people who were related to each other marrying and conceiving defective children. Many were married or allowed to “breed” in accordance to their slave masters desire for a stronger stock of African-American slaves. The slave master were aware of this and subsequently had every reason to reject the idea of interracial marriages. This did not in any way stop them from having sex with their slaves however. Yet what it shows is that a social recognition of the union between the two would not be a supportable idea given the very justification for slavery. A justification that is much more akin to the authority to kill a child in the womb rather than the marriage debate.

Further, white Christian Americans held an edict concerning interracial marriages from the Bible which imparted the dangers of Jewish men following their God Yahweh marrying women from foreign neighboring tribes the danger lies in the men adopting the foreign gods of their new wives. These are all important and valid issue. Given the inimical state of Islam towards the United States were the Muslim allowed to “conquer” America they would instill Shari law without question then where would all the liberal groups find sympathy? It would be an entirely new ball game in America. Another example the Haitians, the 1980’s Haitians that attempted to come to America (The Boat People) were left stranded at sea. Yet Cubans who came to America where given immediate citizenship and the Catholic country of the Dominican Republic have had hundreds of thousands of it’s citizen successful immigrate to this country with a warm reception. That was in fact the immigration policy. Why were the Haitian allowed to die at sea? Well, one only has to see their failed state after the earth quake they suffered earlier this year to see why. These were in fact descendants of slaves who rebelled but whatever standards and morals including spiritual determinations they have made have made their country a failed state, they were probably a failed state in the making with the simple act of an earthquake to bring it to its obvious end.

There are substantial reason why customs are maintained. Homosexuals do tremendous harm to the state, they impose on heterosexuals the forced adoption of a conscious reality which is an out right lie. If homosexuals want to lie to themselves that is one thing but compelling others to engage in that delusion to justify their demands is preposterous. With gay marriages people insist that they have a right to walk on their hands naked every where they go and further insist that you speak to their feet as if everything were perfectly normal and I for one refuse to play that game. As it stands the very reality of “gayness” is an agreement to lie to oneself that superficial social encounters where people refrain from speaking the obvious be adopted as a status quo to all social relationship. If someone has food on their lips just smile and pretend that they do not out of fear of embarrassing them or losing them as a friend rather than to speak the obvious truth. In fact the truth about homosexuals come to light in articles like this one where it is clear just how aggressive this psychiatrically ill people really are. The homosexual does not want to change himself to be in accordance with the very same group to whom he wish entrance and acceptance but insists that he can be just as Catholic as anyone even though he dispenses with the Word of God. He insists that he is just as matured as a heterosexual married couples even when he is incapable of dealing with others as truly other in a psycho-sexual relationship with the opposite sex. He fails to grasp the necessity of “growing up” which is to fill the volume of his soul with experiential encounters that would burst his vanity and pride. Experiences that grow and mature the individual until in fact he has reached psychological as well as sexual maturity by which time he would not be entitled to marry a woman but in fact psycho-sexually welcome it. However in his pride he refuses to accept the parameters of the contest.

Here the homosexuals are clearly “bum rushing” a Cathedral to have a “kiss –in” yet insist that they are Christian and justified by God and only bigotry and fear (homophobia, a diagnosis they are comfortable labeling everyone who opposes them while dispensing with their own.) yet paying no attention to the fact that pride in itself is a negative trait, an inflated sense of ones own self worth.

Americans must not be deceived (as the homosexuals have been by Satan) that these homosexuals are “in love” or even have “love” when rather knnowing exactly what is and is not love is the emblem of maturity itself instead they are delusional and deep down inside spiteful, they hate regular society to the point that they would prefer to rip it to shreds than watch it suceed from the corners of shame the very same have relagated them to, although they were in bed together. There can be no mistaken the heated animosity that comes from these groups. Yet all the while they dance and party to make themselves appear pleasantly innocuous which has always been a lie. They are gay precisely because they refuse to give any one the satisfaction of letting them know how hurt and angry they really are. They postulate question from their own psychological defense gone awry of “who will be harmed by what we do?” because it stems from the psychological defense they themselves have adopted in order to remain proud. They refuse to allow reality to set into their minds and want to proscribe their disease for dealing with life to the rest of us, they insist we join them in the lie. How can one petition to be admitted to a society while at the same time reject the values and customs of the very same society one petitions? Perhaps for the moment that question is better answered in Arizona? What makes them right? What is this delusion that they know better and are morally superior to heterosexuals?

Where is the biological justification for two men engaging in sexual intercourse when they are anatomically incongrous? Homosexual males complete the tasks which involve the two sexual acts a "decent woman" would not perform. Perhaps as a a general rule in the interest of HIV, HPV and psychological trauma we maintain the distinct sexual roles of men, woman and children? Is not maintaining these boundaries literally the least we can do?

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned it is no doubt suspicious to many heterosexuals Catholic and non-Catholics alike the impediment the Church has on the lives of homosexuals. While they are busy promoting the idea that gay marriages will not effect heterosexual marriages for some reason the Catholic Church is negatively effecting their ambitions. The Church has not been an impediment to some of the most notorious criminal figures in history even while they remained nominal members, baptizing their children in the morning and killing a man later that same afternoon. Why do homosexuals then need such recognition from the Catholic Church? Why when you do not agree with the Church’s position on homosexuality, which is God’s position for the Church does not have it’s own doctrine on homosexuality like all Christians they derive it from the authority of the Holy Spirit in sacred scripture, why must homosexuals force the Church to recognize them and further why do they even believe that the Church can? The Bishops are simply following what came before them; the Word of God? It is incidents like this that homosexuals have to perceived as psychiatrically ill.

The fundamental truth concerning the courts is that if they cannot perceive the necessity and validity of maintaining that heterosexuals in marriage are psychological more advanced than homosexuals they invalidate themselves as bodies of true wisdom and sound thought. Water is wet for everyone, those would like to petition the courts other wise can only be successful if the courts themselves are no wiser than the administrators of British Petroleum and AIG.

Catholics Defend French Cathedral de Lyon During Homosexual 'Kiss-In' - International - Catholic Online

Dear Abby…

Abby Sunderland the American sixteen year old girl whose family must be of course long time sea voyagers tried to sail around the world alone. Previously, it would appear to many to be a preposterous assumption except for the fact that Jessica Winters an Australian Abby’s age has already done it before she reached the age of seventeen.

Clearly this can be perceived as a matter of American hegemonic egoism however and that would be correct but there is another not entirely different perspective to take away from Abby Sunderland’s attempt.

The idea that one can put a girl on the ocean without any hope of prayer. What of God, what of the gods of ancient Greek and Norse lore, were they consulted? Recently a remake of the cult classic “Clash of the Titans” was in theaters. It reminded many secularist today that man used to be ruled by gods and overcoming this oppression is the only way towards salvation. Thus this father was comfortable with the idea that as long as his daughter was in satellite contact she was okay.

What then of victor Jessica Winters, what then of the Australians. American and Australia share a similar history, they were penal colonies at least some Australians perceive that notion.American children were taught that the Pilgrims came to America in search of religious freedom and there were many of low repute amongst them. As in all defeats and here Abby Sunderland represents the nation if not factually at least representatively, one has to beg the question: what does the victor have that we do not?

The truth seems to be all that can not be spoken here in America. The truth, the whole truth and nothing but nothing of the truth. The record of an entire legal trial in America is vetted and choreographed with bits or chunks of the case omitted not merely from the case but by the political and psychological and spiritual reality outside of its four walls which bring into question the sanity not merely the legitimacy of the entire procedure. In New York the words “In God We Trust” is still bolted to many court room walls and for good reason. When in the course of sentencing harden criminals to a life behind bars someone’s authority above that of man must be present for no one has a care about the rituals and ceremonies of a lynching.

In New York City for instance the request by the Catholic League to the Empire State Building to honor the colors of the Virgin Mary, blue and white which Mother Teresa honored this August 26 atop the ESB was denied.

Why would Mother Teresa be denied other than the values she espoused were contrary to those of Anthony Malkin the building owner? She was not denied on secular grounds as she was a Noble prize winner, not even on the grounds that she was Catholic. Were that the case some one could argue that even in service to God and the Church during the course of her life Catholic or otherwise as a person she made admiral accomplishments. It certainly in this day and age no testimony to sexism or xenophobia. It has to be therefore because of the values she espoused devotion to the Holy Mother and her personal devotion to the “poorest of the poor”. Certainly if Mr. Malkin held her dedication in esteem he would have no problem with the request. Fundamentally it is the irony of many evils found in humanity, when many see none in the other. Such is the case in abortion, Terri Schivo and others seen as worthless.

This departure from what many Catholics may have felt deviated from a historical appreciation and general acceptance in New York City came to a crashing halt in declining the Catholic Leagues request. Yet, for some time charity has not prevailed in New York City for Catholics and historically it never has. We were fooled into believing so because many of us believed the entire city had reminisced of Christmas tree smells, silver bells and had sugar dumplings dancing in their heads around Christmas. Or that they enjoyed the peaceful abode of a local parish or Cathedral as they came in from a rain soaked city street. Or perhaps were familiar with the slight embarrassment of getting all dressed in those shiny, silky clothes for Easter which made one stand out, that set you apart from the others that day. Slowly but surely Christmas, Easter all revoked from Christianity and especially the Catholics. There is no need to say Merry Christmas in the department store because not everyone is Christian or because it was originally a Pagan practice and nevertheless what is Christmas other than a pleasant convention to purchase goods and talk sentimentally about loving others in a spiritual and not necessarily religious way?

We believed they would treat us like the original godfather, they like all loyal subjects would come and kiss our ring. After all so much of what it means to be Catholic today lies in the past. However they are not loyal subjects of the Pope nor very often for that matter are many Catholics. Yet this separation of Church and private interest was a wake up call for Catholics and non-Catholics alike. Here in New York City we have identified our respective corners and feign no shame in espousing our disdain for Catholics. The equally resentful disdain for Muslims and Jews are only curtailed through politics and other necessities but that facade is crumbling as well. America today is anti-religious which the Protestant themselves espouse, all that is needed is a personal relationship with God. Religious freedom which is the freedom to openly profess ones religion and still be respected as a fellow citizen be damned. The central question of gay marriage proposal lead by the openly gay U.S Congressman Barney Frank was “How would a gay couple effect anyone’s life?. The very ignorance of how demonstrates the error of the homosexual mentality, that we all live separately in a Ganymede tower denying the fact that indeed we are all interdependent.The very proposition alone suggesting we unravel the tissue of society, Holy matrimony, has done exactly that. The rootless mind of the proud will in no time determine heterosexuals to be their inferiors, as stupid, when all along this perception that they share that “this” is like “that” when nothing further could be true changes the values in addition to the variables of the equation and they fail to function. The truth being that two men do not make one whole, no man is sexually attracted to another unless he idolizes himself in the other and as such is considered a psychometric invert, psycho metrics because mans mental energy can be measured. While a man’s mental energy can be plowed into the body of a woman who is meant to have a gravitational pull on mans mental energy, garnering her the unflattering homage as the “ol’ ball and chain”. Two men will merely fly away lost in sentiment and conceit.

Taken a step further all that a secularist demands is the freedom to do what they want to do.They do not need God and or religion. All they need is reason and desire, man, money and material and they can build a paradise on Earth. Rather one could perceive this change in State through Catholic eyes as the end of the world as we know it and maybe not “…feel fine” about it but with fear and trembling working our way to accept it. There is no fear of hell for these people and there was none for Abby Sunderland.

Many Americans are lost at sea in much the same way as Abby Sunderland. Especially the “collapsed Catholic” or rather the Catholic insurgents. Those who have lost the faith have been the most virulent opponents of the Church today. They are demons like pedophile Catholic priests and sensationalist seeking editors found at leading news agencies, working in tandem with the pedophiles to scandalized the Church and shaking away many of the unsteady from their hopes of eternal salvation. They have allied themselves with the atheist and the “Masonic” New World Order builders, who have planned a global secularist socialism future where everything will be great and no one will be restricted. It is a “Brave New World” and the Americans sent sixteen year old Abby Sunderland to prove it. Reminiscent of seventeenth century European royals who ruled nations by Abby’s age except most of them died in their thirties through murder or some currently curable disease.

Who would put their daughter at sea at sixteen years old? Who would ask of such a thing from their young teenage daughter? Abby Sunderland did not make it around the world this time she was rescued at sea by the Australian and French controlled Reunion Island naval forces, God bless her. Americans though are also in need of rescue but to whom will they turn? Public relations men on behalf of the Empire State Building said that if they honored Mother Teresa the ESB would be compelled to honor all the religions. The Church has grounds to ask for a clarification of this statement after ten years of war with radical Islamist whether a discernment can not yet be made between Catholicism and other religions. Perhaps this is too much to ask since the Bishops themselves are perceived as employees of the Vatican and the Pope. Such perception that would hold the current day Pope responsible for the Holy Inquisition and the Crusades would not admit to even original sin assigned by God in order to hold everyone to account. Should not a man of eighty not hold himself guilty for what he did when two years old? Is it not more reasonable that a man who would not atone for his own sins much more for those he has forgotten be held accountable for sins he himself has committed rather than to persecute a man and hold him responsible for historical epochs bulleted recently in a “memo” printed in a nation wide publication? Should the Pope be held accountable for activities that took place hundreds of years before he was even born? The animus for the Pope like that of Isrealy’s begs the question whether this unquenchable hatred has anything to do with the Pope Benedict XVI Joseph Ratzinger was a German national conscripted into the N.A.Z.I party and served as a soldier? Is there an unquenchable hatred amongst atheistic Semites for the German Pope?

At the same time this animus reveals that the devil knows Pope Benedict XVI is a formidable Pope, he is held accountable not merely for the one billion Catholics alive now but for the billions that have come before. The Pope is not Jesus Christ, certainly he would be the first one to tell anyone that. Pope Benedict XVI finished his eighth book before the Church child sex scandal was even over. The administration of one billion people is not enough the devil now wants him to atone for the billions that have come before him. Then tell him that he cant do it, it is impossible. The realm of unpardonable sins in which he lives precludes this simple proposition and yet it is the kernel of the Christian religion. Seeing the Pope atone for sins of his fellow priest he believes that he is petitioning him and if not he than whom? In a country like America where the first book put in print can not be read in our educational facilities how then can these same judge the Church? From where will they start when they know nothing of religion? Dear Abby, were you ever given a Bible to navigate your course over these seas?

When the light of the world illuminates the stains

People are against the teachings of the Church not just the manner in which the bishops handled the cases of pedophile priest and in fact, a smear campaign was established to snuff out the light which illuminates this human stain. The campaign is detectable in the unrealistically high participation in the comment forums of such websites as Yahoo where the negative comments registered approval on a scale of seventy to two which is an unlikely result for general voting habits period. It was found in the cowardice of Jewish groups and the BBC, the N.Y. Times and other media outlets that refuse to make clear that Rev. Raniero Cantalamessa received a letter from an unidentified Jewish friend who in turn made the anti-Semitic comparison regarding the accusation thrown at Pope Bennedict XVI and not Rev. Raniero Cantalamessa himself. It was evinced by the N.Y. Times which will not publish editorial responses from the Archbishop of N.Y. Timothy Dolan but will publish their negative stories concerning the Church. This coming from a newspaper who has the infamous notoriety in New York of having at least two popular journalist guilty of fabricating entire news articles for no other reason than for the aggrandizement of their personal ambitions, Michael Finkle and Jayson Blair.

The Catholic bishops in retrospect to the current vitriol did not act in a unreasonable way at all. The cases that led to hundreds of millions of dollars in damages to the adult victims, the closing of parishes on this account, the vain petitions for the Popes resignation and worse of all the scandal which has led many away from seeking the True faith and All Loving God has indeed been so detrimental that this campaign may have done more harm than good. The smear campaign may have more greatly endangered children from pedophiles by insulating them in the wide spread emotional and financial fatigue which will follow the blitz of current attention come the next cries of abuse by children and their families. No where as a consequence of these lawsuit has any organization been established to monitor and change the wide spread human perception of children as sexual objects from sexual predators.

The Church itself however which has been around for over two thousand years has to deal with political enemies of the Church, a consideration that would hamper one from cavalierly airing ones dirty laundry to the public, especially when those stains incriminate that society as well. Many of whom are homosexuals and in favor of gay marriages, contraception and abortion. All with the perverse idea that the world would be a more morally sound place without the Church when in fact the exact opposite is true. Many of the people so outraged by pedophilia see no equivalence between it and homosexual practices and for that matter bestiality treating the three as three morally distinct categories. Unfortunately they leave the mores of sexual behavior up to popular opinion, incapable as they are to prove the legitimacy of homosexuality on any metaphysical or arch-typical grounds. In their hands it will only be a matter of time before consent is given to normalize even the pedophiles behavior and that of those who have intercourse with animals. The fact remains that even now we not only hear documented stories of bestiality but many of us are only a stones throw away from a neighbor who harbors such pornography in their homes which serve for entertainment for their guest.

On the issue of pedophilia itself the cases that people now here about are fifty years old. Jeff Anderson the lawyer now in pursuit of the Catholic Church and the Pope believes that he has a case before him regarding Fr. Lawerence Murphy who allegedly raped over 200 deaf boys between 1950-1975. However the 1950's was a different era not to be judged by today's standard. In the 1950's if an African-American man made a record he could not put his own face on the cover and hope to sell albums. In the 1950"s that same African-American man were he to be seen would probably be sporting a hairstyle which made him look more white, why was that necessary? In the 1950's if a young woman got pregnant out of wedlock she was hidden out of shame for nine months until she had the baby and often the baby was given away for adoption. In the the 1950's abortion was illegal and homosexuality was a psychiatric disorder. Today homosexuality is considered 'normal' and any dispute of that will classify a person as a 'homophobe' or a bigot proving that even today these sexual charades are still performed, they existed fifty years and they exist today. How easy would it have been to prosecute a pedophile priest fifty years ago? Yes, prosecute because under American law one is innocent until proven guilty, even a pedophile priest has the right to stand trail. How hard would it have been to convict a priest then on the testimony of a deaf child? The trial of the century involving a superstar athlete O.J.Simpson resulted in his acquittal but few were satisfied with the results, why?

The idea of putting priests in places where they no longer have access to children is in itself a folly. The behavior of genuine pedophiles is predatory, they seek out children where ever they are. Mr. Andereson says that his eight year old daughter was molested by her therapist who was a former priest. Why is he then so condemnatory regarding priest when apparently the man who molested his daughter was not a priest at the time? Would Mr. Anderson hold a defrocked priest any less responsible for his actions than he would one who currently wore the collar? Rev. Joseph Palanivel Jeyapaul, the Catholic priest who was accused of molesting a 16 year old girl and sent out of the country to India where he would no longer work with young adults was requested to return to stand trial in America and he agreed but then how can the charge be made that this is exactly what the bishops in America should have done all along?

The nature of pedophilia is that indeed it brings shame not only to it's victim but to a concentric circle of people who failed to defend the child but prefer to defend the reputation of their community so much so that often no one in the circle will come forward to the aid of the victim. It takes a village to rape a child. In pedophile cases parenets often do not want to confront their childs reality because it will shatter their own lives, neither would the press or the police for that matter. In fact most forms of pedophilia come by way of natural incest.

According to the National Center for Victims of Crime a large proportion of rape committed in the United States is perpetrated by a family member: *

Research indicates that 46% of children who are raped are victims of family members.(Langan and Harlow, 1994) The majority of American rape victims (61%) are raped before the age of 18; furthermore, 29% of all forcible rapes occurred when the victim was less than 11 years old. 11% of rape victims are raped by their fathers or step-fathers, and another 16% are raped by other relatives.^[24]

^(wikipedia)

When the pedophilia case in the Church were first reported they were reported in America, then in Germany and then in Ireland, there were less cases reported in Italy, England, Scotland and France. Their were also less reports in South and Central America and Africa. Which indicates a prevalence of a predilection for this sexual behavior exist more strongly in these communities than in others. One must understand that the Church does not export all its clergy from Rome in the countries they reside instead they usually derive them from the state in question.

What The Church Does Not Teach

The Catholic Church does not teach pedophilia. It does not tell members of the Church to go out and rape their neighbors children. Further, the Church and the Pope in particular has to be given credit for owning up to the disheartening reality of the problem and dealing not only with pedophiles but also with homosexuality. Contrarily for instance Europe and the United States support in degrees homosexuality as normal, gay marriages, abortion and currently in the United States military openly declared homosexual lifestyles. European States and the United States definitely support these psycho-sexual disorders in the state and in the military which is one of the many charges stated by Muslim extremist, that the state is making it's citizens psychologically ill.

What has been swept under the rug here or attempted to have been swept under the rug is the very nature of the disorder. Pedophiles seek out positions in society where they can have dominance and control over people, the smaller and more vulnerable the better. They become priest, camp counselors, pediatricians and teachers for this purpose much in the same way arsonist try to become firemen.

Catholics are grateful for all the concern that the rest of America has for our Catholic children. Apparently, pedophilia only happens in the Catholic Church. In the similar vein in which murder, theft and drug overdose, only happens in poor neighborhoods but never in the wealthy ones. Clearly this has been a Catholic problem exclusively, at the same time however the Church and the Church alone has to be given the credit for dealing with pedophilia directly unlike any other concentrated population in the world. The Church illuminates the stains of humanity which is the real reason people want to it put out.

What The Church Does Teach

The Church does teach exclusive heterosexuality, pro-life and forgiveness of sins. This is really what angers people about the Church. Can the Church forgive a pedophile, even one that is a priest, in the words of President Barrack Obama, YES WE CAN! Forgiveness of sins resides at the very crux of the faith and the Church will not be dictated to as to whom they can and cannot forgive. Christ forgave sins while nailed to a cross and has made it clear that priest can forgive man of his sins. This power of forgiveness is what angers and alienates many from the Catholic faith. It is also what the abused victims have been incapable of doing and as such will never be able to heal properly or for that matter receive God's forgiveness according to the teachings of the faith which Christ laid down. For Christ has explain that scandal must come and those that lead one to fall away from the faith will be dealt with but additionally forgiveness is required.

6 But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe to the world because of scandals. For it must needs be that scandals come: but nevertheless woe to that man by whom the scandal cometh. 8 And if thy hand, or thy foot scandalize thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee. It is better for thee to go into life maimed or lame, than having two hands or two feet, to be cast into everlasting fire. 9 And if thy eye scandalize thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee. It is better for thee having one eye to enter into life, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire. 10 See that you despise not one of these little ones: for I say to you, that their angels in heaven always see the face of my Father who is in heaven. Matthew 18:6-10

6 "Shall scandalize"... That is, shall put a stumblingblock in their way, and cause them to fall into sin.


7 "It must needs be"... Viz., considering the wickedness and corruption of the world.


8 "Scandalize thee"... That is, cause thee to offend.


However, forgiveness is also required.

21 Then came Peter unto him and said: Lord, how often shall my brother offend against me, and I forgive him? till seven times? 22 Jesus saith to him: I say not to thee, till seven times; but till seventy times seven times. 23 Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened to a king, who would take an account of his servants. 24 And when he had begun to take the account, one was brought to him, that owed him ten thousand talents. 25 And as he had not wherewith to pay it, his lord commanded that he should be sold, and his wife and children and all that he had, and payment to be made.

24 "Talents"... A talent was seven hundred and fifty ounces of silver, which at the rate of five shillings to the ounce is a hundred and eighty-seven pounds ten shillings sterling.

26 But that servant falling down, besought him, saying: Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all. 27 And the lord of that servant being moved with pity, let him go and forgave him the debt. 28pence: and laying hold of him, throttled him, saying: Pay what thou owest. 29 And his fellow servant falling down, besought him, saying: Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all. 30 And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he paid the debt. But when that servant was gone out, he found one of his fellow servants that owed him an hundred

28 "Pence"... The Roman penny was the eighth part of an ounce, that is, about sevenpence half-penny English.

31 Now his fellow servants seeing what was done, were very much grieved, and they came and told their lord all that was done. 32 Then his lord called him; and said to him: Thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all the debt, because thou besoughtest me: 33 Shouldst not thou then have had compassion also on thy fellow servant, even as I had compassion on thee? 34 And his lord being angry, delivered him to the torturers until he paid all the debt. 35 So also shall my heavenly Father do to you, if you forgive not every one his brother from your hearts.

Lastly it must be made clear that the Church will not be treated as a for profit corporation a philosophy of realism accepted by the heretically for the purpose of profit but rejected as spiritual model of the Church. Nor will she be led into that lie that the Church leaders are alone in this and separated from the layman. Hezbollah, Hamad Karzai of Afghanistan and the Iraqi leadership splinter as it is are treated by the media and other American institutions as independent of their body politic, they are not, Hezbollah has risen to power through the democratic process but still America refuses to recognize them.

Catholic leaders though not democratically elected are not isolated from their flock either. The anti-religious fervor of the American secular atheist, which includes heretics and apostates will not over come the Church with this scandal. The Church is eternal, it has been here before the world and it will exist after the world is gone. God bless.

Is Everybody Happy?:Gays, African-Americans, Civil Rights and the State of Psychological Health In America

Homosexuality has been a particular enemy of mine since it has become a politicized movement.
For psychiatric survivors and the general state of health care in America the legitimization of homosexuality is just another way of sweeping psychological disorders under the rug by sweeping it over the rug and embroidering it into the carpet. The number one fact of American psychological health is that by legitimizing homosexuality we are lowering the medical baseline of psychological health.

When I think of homosexuality deriving a great deal of it's legitimacy through a false fetal heredity of the civil rights movement I am compelled to examine this justification by comparing their existence to not just the struggle for civil rights by African-Americans but even to examine what fidelity between the two 'people' could possibly exist. Did AA strike, unbeknown to them, some Faustian bargain with the queers years before? Was it a three way helping hand where homosexuals help AA in the south and women later in the east only to be supported at this date for their own gay agenda? For some insight into the psychological composition of homosexuals check out Michael Swift cathartic Gay Manifesto.


Then let us ask ourselves what would make African-American and liberal heterosexual Euro-Americans make a covenant with the homosexual crowd and their agenda? Let's look first at the African-Americans.

First there was the idea that by not allowing gays marital rights that would be equivalent to keeping Blacks and Whites from marrying which was the basic reason for most of the segregation that took place. According to Earl Ofari Hutchinson writing in Black America Today.com

"The taboo was based on a deep-seated belief by many whites that blacks are socially, and genetically unfit to share a classroom and a marital bedroom with whites."

Albeit that was written in 2003 and indeed many may have a different view between these two movememts today. However, in that opinion piece Hutchinson does not elaborate as to why Caucasins percieved AA men as "unfit", let us ofcourse stay our hand in terms of Caucasin men finding AA women acceptable to sleep with if not to openly marry because we are well aware of our historical facts that indeed they did. Why then would the Caucasins shun their former slaves and believe them to "socially and genetically" unfit. Could it have any thing to do with the fact that it was indeed the Caucasians who controlled the breeding process of many slaves? It is a documented fact that African slaves were not able to conduct their social habits under slavery and therefore the possibility of sleeping with a known relative was genuine. This was one of the many themes that Spike Lee picked up on in his film "Bamboozled" (2000)starring Damion Waynes, Savion Glover and Tommy Davidson. In this case being the perpetrators of such a moral offense can it be said that knowledge of their actions speak to their own defense?

Then ofcourse there was the Bible verse that forbade the mixing of seeds.

Deuteronomy 22:9: "Thou shalt not sow thy vineyard with divers seeds: lest the fruit of thy seed which thou hast sown, and the fruit of thy vineyard, be defiled."

There are several lines in the Bible similar to these which would indeed suggest that intercultural marriages were forbidden by God, however, in many instances it was not so much a matter of 'race' as it was of a husband being converted to a pagan or idolatrous religion. Nevertheless there does appear to be ample evidence that intercultural marriages were forbidden by God through the Bible. This is of course the same Bible that homosexuals either completely ignore or claim are simply misread by Jews and Christians alike for millenniums. The Rainbow Alliance website linked above declares that Mark 7:18 is how Jesus speaks to homosexual acts. It reads

18 And he saith to them: So are you also without knowledge? understand you not that every thing from without, entering into a man cannot defile him:

Here is how the Rainbow Alliance explains the application of that same verse.

"A lot has been said about what Jesus did or did not have to say about homosexuality. Jesus Christ is the core of Christianity. Yet today many people seem to consider homosexuality to be the single most important issue before Christians. Catholics claim that being homosexual is not a sin, but homosexual acts ARE sinful. Others use the words of the Bible to deny gays basic human rights, such as the right to marry. Or they use the Bible to justify abusing and even murdering gays. It is hard to believe that Jesus would have been completely silent about something so important. Yet the claim is that, somehow, he was.

That claim is wrong. Jesus DID speak of homosexual acts. Specifically he said:

"There is NOTHING from without a man, that entering into him can defile him"

Those are the words of Jesus Christ, from Mark 7."

There is clearly some degree of bastardization in the interpretation or better said perversion. Whereas Jesus was talking about the supernatural state of the soul, his words have been construed here to include the human penis. Which leads me to my second hypothesis.

There has been a kinship between the two people on their appreciation for concreteness and immediacy. There has been a lot of use of the word "external" many in the corporate world use it to describe unforeseen consequences of their actions as in "externalities". Psychologist have a term called 'external validity", my term here is best explained as carnality.

"5 Thus saith the Lord: Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord."
Jeremiah 17:5

Well within the parameters of AA men and homosexuals is this sense that the flesh is invincible, that by the flesh alone against the various elements and other men, men can abide. This is of course the tell tale sign of that most infectious and perniciously pervasive sin of pride.

African American men and homosexuals both have a reputation to be full of pride. In fact in Ezekial 16:49 we find,

49 Behold this was the iniquity of Sodom thy sister, pride, fulness of bread, and abundance, and the idleness of her, and of her daughters: and they did not put forth their hand to the needy, and to the poor. 50 And they were lifted up, and committed abominations before me: and I took them away as thou hast seen.

AA men are notoriously known for putting on a lot of pump and circumstance when they feel slighted or even when they are simply doing well, they compete with one another as to who has the best of what, at least in a characterized dramatization. Homosexuals by the same measure seek to get married not because of whatever benefits that marriage may offer, legally as well as emotionally but because marriage is a social climb, the "gold standard" of social cache, says Nathanal Rauch a senior writer for National Journal magazine and author of books on public policy who was in favor of gay marriage at a debate held at the University of Colorado in Boulder, January 2010. Maggie Galagher author and social commenter as well as the president of National Organization for Marriage in her own recent publication "The Case For Marriage" is not merely in favor of marriage being exclusive to heterosexuals but contest the idea that people in same sex union can ever be considered married at all. Mrs. Gallagher bases her position on the truth about the dilemma.


Gallagher and Rauch debate same-sex 'marriage' in Boulder :: Catholic News Agency (CNA)

It becomes clear from analyzing Rauches position in the debate that homosexuals are merely exhibiting a symptomatic trait of their disorder, a need to satiate their pride. Very simply, they want to have access to be in societies "gold standard". Pride is therefore the nexus between AA men in particular and homosexuals, pride is the nexus between any man and homosexuals, homosexuality can very well be said to be the manifestation of it.

Before I go any further let me make clear that this is not a diatribe of malice directed at either AA people or homosexuals. It is in fact an examination of AA people in relations to their civil rights and homosexuals political agenda for the United States. In the United States the toll of Antebellum slavery was indeed devastating to the familiar system of the AA people, families were separated under a chattel slavery and sold through the diaspora of the capitalist system.
There were forced breeding practices which are akin to the eugenic theories that were taking ground in America. Practices that have indeed shaped humans before, although through God and nature not another man. Sickle cell shaped red blood cells for instance, found in many West Africans proved as a mutations to the red blood cell that served to defend against malaria.
A boon which made them 'black gold' to their slavers though. Although this were in itself a troubling and difficult passage for the AA people in fact most are today as American citizens wealthier and to an extent healthier than their counter parts in Africa.

Homosexuality was not born out of a legal right to vote as legal citizens of a nation who were completely denied this 'right' for years,homosexuality on the other hand was simply removed from the Diagnostical Statistical Manuel of Psychiatric Disorders. The perception of this disorder has been ameliorated to the general public. However, unrecorded disorders are still disorders. It would be at this time that an analogy is in order however, it is even more important to note that analogies are themselves misinterpreted everyday by homosexuals which gives concern as to whether this is a debate that can resolved by reason at all, clearly the interpretation of Mark 7:18 above is evidence of that. We are living in a "say anything" era where the value of the words spoken and their logical operations are ignored under some foregone conclusion that ideology is insignificant and we should all solve for comfort, social status, prestige and wealth.

In a recent debate on the legitimization of gay 'marriages' as posted in the Catholic News Agency
I wrote:

"Mrs.Gallahger is correct in postulating that homosexuals can not marry simply on the grounds that they cannot form marriages. Homosexuals attempting marriage is like trying to suck a psychological ice cube through a straw, it cannot be, not because the ice is being discriminated against by other quantities of water. It is because the ice cube has to change state in order to get through the straw as a defacto aspect of reality. The current state of a homosexuals is that they have calcified their souls in pride, even to the point where because they are universally superior to everyone they need not submit to even the most obvious rules of nature.

They have jettisoned the entire gauntlet of human psychological development and thrown hundreds of years of moral as well as religious values over their shoulders but still expect to be welcomed under the tent as equals. The primary problem stems from ignoring that homosexuality is a psychological disorder originating from this psychological immaturity the result of inpatients, or a willingness to admit emotional suffering. Under no way ought heterosexuals be compared to them. That would consent to the psychotic perception that men and women are the same, that what a man does sexually with a woman can find it's equivalence with what a man does with another man.
Let us be clear it is precisely the inability of one to distinguish between two distinct objects or situations the very evidence of psychosis."

Homosexuality as a legitmate state of psychological health is itself the problem. When we come to our senses and realize that we are debating with people who won't take 'no' for an answer and realize that as a sign of psychosis we will all be better off.

Love Divine All Loves Excelling

Great hymnal music is not easy to find. Here is an excellent rendition of one of my favorite songs, "Love Divine, All Love Excelling." I went to one Protestant site NetHymnal which had all of the hymns they were familiar with or wished to present at their site. However, I did not find this song with this tune. I could be mistaken as the music was really MIDI recording, all songs sounded as if they were played on a keyboard or synthesiser. I went to the World Library Publications, the publishing company which publishes the missal that my parish uses but they would only sell the sheet music, not present the lyrics or provide a demonstration of the hymn.

So I am indebted to DJMichaelAngelo for his excellent performance.