New York Times Modernist Homosexual Mentality Unsafe For America

http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=hudson_upcoming_events&id=773
Gaberial Schonfeld spoke in May about his new book Necessary Secrets: National Security, the Media, and the Rule of Law. He explains how on several occasions the New York Times as well as other media sources have worked with National Security Employees or "leakers" which produced great losses for American security and defense.

Here, I refer to it as a homosexual mind set because of the famous ranting of openly gay congressman Barney Frank who went on a Kruschev like tantrum begging what he thought to be an unanswerable if not rhetorical question of how homosexual marriage could possibly effect the lives of their heterosexual neighbors. When in fact, any person in their sound mind, the subconscious mind, could tell you that trends and common acceptance of customs are perpetuated by the masses for the greater good of social cohesion and the avoidance of ostracism. The irony of course being the homosexual's exploitation of this interdependency amongst people in which they demand to be recognized as equal and accepted in community but foresake and hold has a trivial issue the long standing adherence to natural law the people they want to live openly amongst cherish. Further they claim that their lives lived outside of the closet, no differently than it was lived inside of the closet will have no effect on America's standards of social and moral behavior. The shadows and the phantasies of the dark and cramped closet are now to be performed without moral inhibition in the conscious light of day. When in fact the only thing normal about homosexual behaviour is their demonstrative psychosis which blinds them from comprehending how the human behavior of one influences the human behavior of others and yet every rule of social acceptance is predicated on this phenomenon.

More specifically, the recorded seminar above has an introduction from General Haydon, former CIA director. He expresses what he rightly percieves as the communal responsibility of journalist and how their actions can jeopardize national security in contrast to their self declared role of protecting Americans from a government run amok. There is this ever present balance between an informed public and national security which publications like the New York Times ignore.

The traditional role of the press as the fourth estates comes into question as many roles have changed in this era of globalization. Much in the same way the fulcrum of pressure that ordinarily kept people out of bankruptcy has diminished to the point where bankruptcy is now nothing more than a financial strategy most everyone is willing to employ. Today the question arises as to whether the press is really a counter balance to the three branches of government as it has consistently argued in decades past has been the preeminent legitimization for not disclosing their confidential sources or are they merely an agency complict in a crime which may have national security repercusions far into the future they could never have foreseen.

Leaks when carried out by government intelligence officials are crimes. Are the news professionals reporting the story they received from them complicit in this crime?

In the Catholic Church Sex Scandal of 2010, the New York Times let loose a barrage of defamatory articles with legal cases mostly supplied by Jeff Anderson the prosecuting attorney against the Church. What then was the justification for essentially leasing their circulation to an attorney who was currently prosecuting the case? The Church is not government so it could not be said to be performing this very biased attacks for the sake of National Security. Nor can the Church be said to be directly involved with the New York Times in any way. However, it still lent out it's circulation to an attorney who was literally in the middle of his prosecution. Why, and what should the Federal Government or the State government fear (as they attempted to defaming the current New York State Governor) from the New York Times selling out its circulation? The answer is simple, what propagandist would not like to have access to the The New York Times readership? Well certainly a tremendous amount of unflattering things can be said against several agencies that serve Americas' interests. The C.I.A. ,N.S.A, the United States Military any one of which could have it's past files and action regurgitated upon an unsuspecting public blasting controversial and shrouded activities throughout the fifties, sixties and seventies. Had these agencies existed as long as the Church it is quite possible that they would go back hundreds and even thousands of years of independently concluded "wrong doings". Looking at events in the past through the prism of today's secular democracy which currently perceives two men marrying as a civil right. It becomes clear that what was initially perceived as an unbiased public service to keep the public in formed for the sake of democracy can alternately be refitted to be used on the offensive. The shield of confidentiality protecting their source which they so zealously preserve for themselves applies in the Church Sex Scandal only so far as their publishing credibility is concerned yet unless the source is disclosed, it can verily be anyone with an interest in destablizing Church or the United States for that matter, including Al Qaeda.

Mr. Schoenfeld argues that the state has a right to keep some of it's secrets secret in the interest of national security to which no one would argue, however he goes one step further and question what civic responsibility the press have even if they come across issues of national security. Returning to Congressman Franks temper tantrum for a moment, what social responsibility do Americans owe one another? The Empire State Building refused to honor the Mother Teresa in lights this year but if the Empire State Building would to be hit with a plane similar to the Twin Towers, would Catholics in the vicinity be justified in not helping the victims? Are we one nation under God during war and sudden tragedy but independent of one another during all other times? Is it not the essence of psychological maturity when one commits to sharing in the social enviornment of another even if he or she does not particularly enjoy it but instead recognizes an inteterdendent solidarity amongst all when the waif of cigerette smoke and the sound of music cannot be avioded but also need not be xenophobically disdained? Certainly were a bomb to explode in the middle of a crowded Manhattan street it's only criteria for whom it will effect would be it's blast radius. With in the radius of this bomb it would not matter who was Catholic, Jewish, Muslim or atheist.

At the same time does not the Church and the State have the right to reserve judgement on how they respond to incidents within their respective domains as a legitimate internal decision making process? Similarly, the editorial decision of the Times are exclusively reserved by them they Times does not solicit the opinion of any other body as to what it should print. This is also an internal decision making process which they themselves treat as private if not secret.
Yet the Vatican and the United States are neither private or necessarily act in secret, they are soverign, neither are a private 'buisness' to wit liabilities can be claimed as if each and every incident which occurs right outside their doors can be litigated as a simple slip and fall case.
Major Nisan Hidal, the tradey of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans or even the British Petrolem oil spill can be readily construed as federal government lapses but then so can the Vietnamn War and all other actions the Executive and legislative branch involves itself. Do we hold the state responsible for the actions of it's adversaries as well, for all the cases of slip and fall which are deliberate frauds?

Now the Catholic Church faces a Supreme Court trial. Yet it faces the trial under the provincial laws of Oregon. In Oregon, the Bishops are seen as "employees' of the The Holy See and the priest are seen as "employees" of the Bishops. This false nomenclature or mercantile transposition of a mercantile relatedness does not suite the relationship of the Church as much as it does a shopping mall. Certainly, there has to be some consideration for States, Multi-nationals and the Church, which in part may explain why international bodies like the U.N. are in New York and not Oregon. One wonders were the president of Iran to visit an embassy in Oregon (or for whatever reason he might be there) would they arrest him under similar statutes?

This questionable judgement when it comes to more complex organisations like the Church brings into question whether a change of venue is warranted, since it seems that only under Oregon State can the Bishops be viewed in this light. Are congressmen employees of the State, to the point where they merely carry out the wishes of the state for pay? Are Colonels employees of the military, does their paycheck reflect a reasonable compensation for what they do? Perhaps in fact this is the mentality that has swept America which is why Major Nisan Hidal was allowed to be promoted with out any qualms that an actively faithful Muslim man was working so closely with American troops set to depart to Afghanistan and effectively neutralize as many of his fellow Muslims as they saw fit. This again is Barney Franks homosexual mind set where by one fails to intuit how ones actions effects an other's. The homosexual mind set, or 'gay', actively excludes the intuitive reality or perhaps what was formerly known in the ancient world as 'ether' or perhaps 'love'. It attempts in its psychologically deranged defensive posture to ignore emotions, what one feels, and the entire gamut of subconscious reality which can be better learned in a heterosexual relationship. The immediately apprehend truths that do not need to be extrapolated into conscious debate which few have words to express because here to fore they were taken as intuitive, axiomatic and self evident truths. Only men and women can marry, the Church is not a mercantile business and one can not transpose that relationship upon them any more than they can upon the lawyer/client relationship, the doctor/patient relationship or the penitent/confessor relationship. While these fiduciary relationships imply money as the paramount interest they more accurately reflect the true application of human rights, the right to private council. Yet we have seen the United States succumb to the 'business of America is business" model applied to all walks of life. Hospitals were run as if they were factories by HMO's(Health Medical Organizations), war in Iraq was surmised to be identical to the liberation of France in 1945, entire baseball teams were classified as a "product' on the field all in the inescapable reality of having only economic primacy and subsequently the mercantile paradigm as the sole reason for being which could be applied. Even beef and poultry farms were operated at un Godly rates of reproduction, life and slaughter, with slaughter houses killing up to 5000 cattle a day, injecting them with Bovine Growth Hormones to keep their meat as lean as chicken. Only to be slowed down by Mad Cow disease because they were feed dead cats and dogs presumably as a means to cut the cost of feeding them. This lead to a suspension of importation of American Beef by the Japanese.

The homosexual mindset as proved out by the New York Times, the Associated Press and Reuters, not to mention Time magazine. Harbors the notion that one can print things irresponsibly, they treat great epochs of European history as mere foot notes, the Crusades, the Inquisition and simply hope that what most have associated with the reality about these events, no matter how vague, will suffice to garner the animosity of the reader against the Church much in the way a screen writer attempts to influence the emotions of the movie watcher, with little regard to historical accuracy.

What the Church needs now is a metaphysical change of venue. Currently Oregon has dictated how it will perceive the Church and it has chosen to perceive the Church as a "private" entity like a bank, filled with employees who answer to the Pope and the Holy See as a corporate headquarters. The irony is not lost at all in fact that for decades the United States has abide by a policy of 'separation of Church and State'. This speaks exclusively to the Catholic Church and not nearly or at all to Protestantism, which does not have a universal Church, or one body, the organization of which RICO statues have been seen appropriate to apply in the Church scandal, for if there is only one body and one head, certainly it can be held accountable for the actions of all it's participants. Rather, only the clergy or "employees" are to be held responsible and not the parishioners. This then brings into question why would any mercantile organizations be barred from the worlds largest capitalist country? Who then is the Church in this separation and why are they separated? Has the separation of Church and State just dissolved?

Certainly an organized body, a person, has the right to present itself in court under the guise of their own self perceived identity. No one has to go into a trial under the characterization of the plantiff. Where that not true, how would a fair trial be possible? African-Americans in 1935 Alabama would thus be characterized as unintelligent, shiftless "internal problems" whenever they went to court from the very beginning and that has historically been the case. Even to the point where animals were allowed to testify against them, a horse would be summoned to stomp it's hooves twice for "yes" and once for "no". The trial would commence with the defendant attempting first to plead his way out of the psychotic perceptions of the plaintiff. This has dangerous implications in this era of terrorism and terror trials.

In the end one might suspect that we are witnessing a new dark ages in the United States and Western civilization where people are content to lie or perceive others as they see fit rather than to adhere to logic and reason. What are human rights, are they rights a man has under God, or are they rights men bestow bilaterally amongst themselves? Then again, what are human wrongs and when can you deduce that the moral fiber of a country has been removed. Is it not when natural law is devalued? Is it not when reason and logic are replaced with ambition and political motives? Is it not when truth is barred from legal proceeding and medical diagnosis. In the famous words of Pontius Pilate, "What is truth?". Will America succumb to a dark age of lies in order to shape it self into prefabricated state drawn from the delusional fantasies of it's own moral imagination, or will we respect the truth of God and admit that man is bereft without Him? Much of the truth can be known but comprehensive understanding through the eyes of mature men who can hold the threads of liberty, justice and truth in hands of sincere humanitarianism, abide by natural law and reason with the logos of divine love.

What Sex Scandal?

Having lived in New York City all of my life, through the cold war, A.I.D.S epidemic the crack epidemic and having a relative who sold drugs in the South Bronx, living with relatives in an apartment who were on drugs I have an unsettled sense of contempt for what I would call "urban secular blasphemy" that an article like this pursues. The idea of this incident as being a back breaking straw upon the camel is contrary to the urban survival strategy many of us have honed over the years. As a New Yorker I could only tell you that if you believe this child sex scandal of the Catholic Church is the most evil thing that I have ever heard in a hierarchy of evil I would sooner submit that a writer like those at the New York Times be placed right above these pedophile priest, cover up Bishops or ebophile priests because the lie and liar are more evil.

Burning people in an oven, genocide in Rwanda, former Yugoslavia, the selling of children by their own parents into slavery and for sex, selling drugs to the young woman next door with three children to care for, turning ten year old boys into drug addicted mercenaries who kill men and rape women three times their own age. Roman soldiers whom most historian glorify who unwound with a nice young boy on their penis after a hard day of killing and crucifying non- Roman citizens.My list goes on and on and at the top of that list rest the lie.

When I first heard of the child sex scandal of the Catholic Church back in 2002, it really shook me up all the way to the point that I left the Church and went to a Baptist church. However, I have found that they were although very good not solid in doctrine in much the same way the United States and this article is ersatz. I returned to the Catholic Church based on a prophecy given to me by a woman there at the Baptist church. Yes, we Christians still adhere to prophets and prophetess and when you pursue the religious all of the mystery has to be taken into effect, that includes God, it cannot be exclude and discarded as rubbish as is the status quo in the secular world.

This new era that we live in is a new dark age because between the homosexuals and the pro-choice crowd there is a real attempt to preclude people from logical and conscious thought. For instance fighting against sonograms before an abortion takes place, not using DNA evidence to prove that the child and the mother are not the same person, why, aren't we constantly praising the advances science has offered us?

This scandal is only a scandal to those who hold a sentimental vision that (a) children are innocent and (b) the Catholic Church is a mere vision of purity and also innocence. When in fact although we can not settle when life begins and we kill 4000 babies in the womb we say upon birth up until the year of two (when they become terrible) that children are innocent. We say the same about people caught in a bomb blast in Iraq but we do not know anything about their lives or why all of sudden they are innocent, is it because they have nothing to do with their own demise? Children are not innocent, where that the case they would never smack their own mothers in the face at 2 years old. Children are young, not innocent, they are relatively harmless, not innocent. Innocence is not a property of nature, not at two, not at eighteen, not at ninety, plants are not innocent, they are plants. Those that died in the bomb blast can be a number of people, none are innocent. We just don't know what sins they may have. In Catholicism all are turned over to original sin in order that everyone may justified, God did that, not the Church, that is the religion. The only ones that are innocent was the Virgin Mary (The Immaculate Conception) and Jesus the Christ, who died for our sins as God and man, who was without sin and and the only one who could pay for our sins, thus absolving us of paying for them ourselves. So in effect, on a sentimental subconscious plane people are like teenagers spraying graffiti on a subway car, creating their own narrative and applying their narrative to Catholicism. All of these "poor children" and many were young teenagers, came home, that can not be said for the victims of abortion. So which is the greater evil? Which would you as a parent choose for your child? All of these "poor children" are now well compensated adults, where is your dead child? All these "poor children" are now fifty years old. So in effect if you are thirty or forty years old or more, there never was a time when this did not happen. Just because you lived like an ostrich with your head in the sand or because you never lived in a big city like Rome a thousand years ago or New York during the seventies and eighties or L.A. at any given time what am I to say to you and the reality of evil? Yes Virginia there is a Santa Claus and there are vampires and werewolves too, perhaps now you are old enough to "hear" this.
What do I care how flabbergasted you are now? Even the victims of clerical sexual abuse knew more about reality at fourteen than your just discovering. Your naivete is contemptible, by NYC standards, we don't have time for you.
Should anyone care about how shocked you are? Who cares, as we say to jumpers in NYC during the seventies, jump! Child sex abuse, cigarette smoking is on this list but homosexuality and abortion are not? God forbid you smoke cigarettes!

Fire rips through University Avenue church

Fire rips through University Avenue church

The film above is a report of a fire at a local church where there was scrawling of graphitti which said some pretty ugly things and it was suspected to be gang related. The link just above it is a report from Bronx 12 News which reported on the St. Nicholas of Tolentine fire. This fire was also said to be suspicious. However, the fire at St. Nicholas has not been labeled a hate crime which it probably should.

It cannot be stressed enough the sick and demented souls that really take up arms against Christians and Catholics are still around us. It is not Alabama 1955 in the rural south this time. No, it is the Bronx NY 2010.

Although these happened earlier this year, they needed to be posted side by side so that people can get a good idea of the general nature of evil that exists in this very liberal NYC area. No wonder Mother Teresa will not be honored in lights at the Empire States Building.

Yet, it cannot be ignored that Catholics in particular were not very welcomed in this town at first. Probably everyone is familiar with Leonardo Dicaprios “Gangs of New York” which gave a fairly good depiction of life in America for early Catholics. We have prevailed then and we will prevail now.

Catholic Bishop Luigi Padovese Assassinated in Southern Turkey - International - Catholic Online

Catholic Bishop Luigi Padovese Assassinated in Southern Turkey - International - Catholic Online

Gone but not forgotten is the Bishop of Turkey recently murder by his driver who, for all supposed intent converted to Catholicism but in truth still served his master the devil. Bishop Luigi Padovese was murder by his driver after the driver learned that the faithful Bishop cancelled his trip to Cypress to meet with the Pope who issued his Instrumentum Laboris (Working documents http://www.apostolicvisitation.org/en/news/resources/InstrumentumLaboris.pdf) to the Churches of the Middle East.

Bishop Padovese was in fact the same Bishop who buried the recent victim of prejudice and Islamic hatred Fr Anrea Santoro whose death when he presided over in Trabozon Turkey. Fr Andrea Santoro, a Fidei Donum priest who was assinated in Trabzon Turkey in 2006.

This story was altogether ignored for the better part by CNN, Reuters,Associate Press and many of the other secular television media. It was posted as a single paragraph at best. Yet here was a Catholic Bishop killed by a Muslim extremist masquerading as a convert as he, Bishop Padovese did what he could to secure the safety of Pope Benedict XVI. Perhaps were the Bishop an American Citizen there might have been more coverage of it but even in that regard it is unlikely. The irony of much of the American life today is that many of the national enemies are Americans themselves much in the same way as a majority of the Church's worst enemies considered themselves either lapse Catholics or former Catholics who need to comfort their evil cynicism which is nothing more than the result of their total failure to comply with God’s decrees. Weakness in the flesh often leads to these dangerous quixotic crusaders to play out their tragic “my mommy took her breast from me too soon..”therapy sessions in public forums which no doubt they themselves have discovered to be worthless, good for nothing self loathing animus fit only to be slung out on the laps of their unsuspecting subscribers like a woman unpacking her heart on complete strangers the excrement of her own self deluded convultions.

Primacy of Truth over Power. St. Thomas More, Man for This Season - Living Faith - Home & Family - Catholic Online

Primacy of Truth over Power. St. Thomas More, Man for This Season - Living Faith - Home & Family - Catholic Online  

St. Thomas Moore has been canonized and respected as the Saint for Statesmen and Politicians.Certainly it would be best to send a copy of this man’s great integrity to Nancy Pelosi and the other so-called Catholics there on Capital Hill. However, it is a good thing to even recognize the value of integrity in ones actions particularly as a politician and in fact I believe that it is the Catholic Church alone that has such a saint or a veneration for the truth in it’s entirety. Certainly a dedication to the falsehood of abortion, contraception and homosexuality is a testament of a nation willing to live with a lie for the sake of comfort and convenience. 

What is not recommended is to hand out little awards in the name of this great saint certainly that would not be in accordance with his actions. As of yet however there are politicians and clergy whom I would like to send a reminder of what this great saint did as a reminder to maintain their integrity. Along with St. Aloysius(Luigi) Gonzaga whom the clergy and devoted pray to for purity (whom I will dedicate a separate posting) St. Thomas Moore is portends that kind of statesman like quality that we have not seen in quite sometime. Certainly the president does not have his qualities with all of his back room deal making. (For more on that go to my political blog  Freedom From Democracy.

Catholics Defend French Cathedral de Lyon During Homosexual 'Kiss-In' - International - Catholic Online

Homosexual protestors have really become an army of socially defiant enemies of the state. After they discard God and secular social convention they then proceed to lead people into a debate about the subject, stating “Who can it harm?”. Their very question is indicative that they have not the mental health to be perceived as psychologically healthy adults.

Constantly the homosexual groups look at African-American history in terms of racial segregation and even cases where in prison people have been allowed to marry (whether they were allowed to be married as same sex couples the article does not say.) and use these bastardized groups to lend legitimacy to their case which they believe people will allow because they are too afraid to mention the obvious.

African-Americans under slavery lived in bastardized sexual relationships, with people who were related to each other marrying and conceiving defective children. Many were married or allowed to “breed” in accordance to their slave masters desire for a stronger stock of African-American slaves. The slave master were aware of this and subsequently had every reason to reject the idea of interracial marriages. This did not in any way stop them from having sex with their slaves however. Yet what it shows is that a social recognition of the union between the two would not be a supportable idea given the very justification for slavery. A justification that is much more akin to the authority to kill a child in the womb rather than the marriage debate.

Further, white Christian Americans held an edict concerning interracial marriages from the Bible which imparted the dangers of Jewish men following their God Yahweh marrying women from foreign neighboring tribes the danger lies in the men adopting the foreign gods of their new wives. These are all important and valid issue. Given the inimical state of Islam towards the United States were the Muslim allowed to “conquer” America they would instill Shari law without question then where would all the liberal groups find sympathy? It would be an entirely new ball game in America. Another example the Haitians, the 1980’s Haitians that attempted to come to America (The Boat People) were left stranded at sea. Yet Cubans who came to America where given immediate citizenship and the Catholic country of the Dominican Republic have had hundreds of thousands of it’s citizen successful immigrate to this country with a warm reception. That was in fact the immigration policy. Why were the Haitian allowed to die at sea? Well, one only has to see their failed state after the earth quake they suffered earlier this year to see why. These were in fact descendants of slaves who rebelled but whatever standards and morals including spiritual determinations they have made have made their country a failed state, they were probably a failed state in the making with the simple act of an earthquake to bring it to its obvious end.

There are substantial reason why customs are maintained. Homosexuals do tremendous harm to the state, they impose on heterosexuals the forced adoption of a conscious reality which is an out right lie. If homosexuals want to lie to themselves that is one thing but compelling others to engage in that delusion to justify their demands is preposterous. With gay marriages people insist that they have a right to walk on their hands naked every where they go and further insist that you speak to their feet as if everything were perfectly normal and I for one refuse to play that game. As it stands the very reality of “gayness” is an agreement to lie to oneself that superficial social encounters where people refrain from speaking the obvious be adopted as a status quo to all social relationship. If someone has food on their lips just smile and pretend that they do not out of fear of embarrassing them or losing them as a friend rather than to speak the obvious truth. In fact the truth about homosexuals come to light in articles like this one where it is clear just how aggressive this psychiatrically ill people really are. The homosexual does not want to change himself to be in accordance with the very same group to whom he wish entrance and acceptance but insists that he can be just as Catholic as anyone even though he dispenses with the Word of God. He insists that he is just as matured as a heterosexual married couples even when he is incapable of dealing with others as truly other in a psycho-sexual relationship with the opposite sex. He fails to grasp the necessity of “growing up” which is to fill the volume of his soul with experiential encounters that would burst his vanity and pride. Experiences that grow and mature the individual until in fact he has reached psychological as well as sexual maturity by which time he would not be entitled to marry a woman but in fact psycho-sexually welcome it. However in his pride he refuses to accept the parameters of the contest.

Here the homosexuals are clearly “bum rushing” a Cathedral to have a “kiss –in” yet insist that they are Christian and justified by God and only bigotry and fear (homophobia, a diagnosis they are comfortable labeling everyone who opposes them while dispensing with their own.) yet paying no attention to the fact that pride in itself is a negative trait, an inflated sense of ones own self worth.

Americans must not be deceived (as the homosexuals have been by Satan) that these homosexuals are “in love” or even have “love” when rather knnowing exactly what is and is not love is the emblem of maturity itself instead they are delusional and deep down inside spiteful, they hate regular society to the point that they would prefer to rip it to shreds than watch it suceed from the corners of shame the very same have relagated them to, although they were in bed together. There can be no mistaken the heated animosity that comes from these groups. Yet all the while they dance and party to make themselves appear pleasantly innocuous which has always been a lie. They are gay precisely because they refuse to give any one the satisfaction of letting them know how hurt and angry they really are. They postulate question from their own psychological defense gone awry of “who will be harmed by what we do?” because it stems from the psychological defense they themselves have adopted in order to remain proud. They refuse to allow reality to set into their minds and want to proscribe their disease for dealing with life to the rest of us, they insist we join them in the lie. How can one petition to be admitted to a society while at the same time reject the values and customs of the very same society one petitions? Perhaps for the moment that question is better answered in Arizona? What makes them right? What is this delusion that they know better and are morally superior to heterosexuals?

Where is the biological justification for two men engaging in sexual intercourse when they are anatomically incongrous? Homosexual males complete the tasks which involve the two sexual acts a "decent woman" would not perform. Perhaps as a a general rule in the interest of HIV, HPV and psychological trauma we maintain the distinct sexual roles of men, woman and children? Is not maintaining these boundaries literally the least we can do?

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned it is no doubt suspicious to many heterosexuals Catholic and non-Catholics alike the impediment the Church has on the lives of homosexuals. While they are busy promoting the idea that gay marriages will not effect heterosexual marriages for some reason the Catholic Church is negatively effecting their ambitions. The Church has not been an impediment to some of the most notorious criminal figures in history even while they remained nominal members, baptizing their children in the morning and killing a man later that same afternoon. Why do homosexuals then need such recognition from the Catholic Church? Why when you do not agree with the Church’s position on homosexuality, which is God’s position for the Church does not have it’s own doctrine on homosexuality like all Christians they derive it from the authority of the Holy Spirit in sacred scripture, why must homosexuals force the Church to recognize them and further why do they even believe that the Church can? The Bishops are simply following what came before them; the Word of God? It is incidents like this that homosexuals have to perceived as psychiatrically ill.

The fundamental truth concerning the courts is that if they cannot perceive the necessity and validity of maintaining that heterosexuals in marriage are psychological more advanced than homosexuals they invalidate themselves as bodies of true wisdom and sound thought. Water is wet for everyone, those would like to petition the courts other wise can only be successful if the courts themselves are no wiser than the administrators of British Petroleum and AIG.

Catholics Defend French Cathedral de Lyon During Homosexual 'Kiss-In' - International - Catholic Online

Dear Abby…

Abby Sunderland the American sixteen year old girl whose family must be of course long time sea voyagers tried to sail around the world alone. Previously, it would appear to many to be a preposterous assumption except for the fact that Jessica Winters an Australian Abby’s age has already done it before she reached the age of seventeen.

Clearly this can be perceived as a matter of American hegemonic egoism however and that would be correct but there is another not entirely different perspective to take away from Abby Sunderland’s attempt.

The idea that one can put a girl on the ocean without any hope of prayer. What of God, what of the gods of ancient Greek and Norse lore, were they consulted? Recently a remake of the cult classic “Clash of the Titans” was in theaters. It reminded many secularist today that man used to be ruled by gods and overcoming this oppression is the only way towards salvation. Thus this father was comfortable with the idea that as long as his daughter was in satellite contact she was okay.

What then of victor Jessica Winters, what then of the Australians. American and Australia share a similar history, they were penal colonies at least some Australians perceive that notion.American children were taught that the Pilgrims came to America in search of religious freedom and there were many of low repute amongst them. As in all defeats and here Abby Sunderland represents the nation if not factually at least representatively, one has to beg the question: what does the victor have that we do not?

The truth seems to be all that can not be spoken here in America. The truth, the whole truth and nothing but nothing of the truth. The record of an entire legal trial in America is vetted and choreographed with bits or chunks of the case omitted not merely from the case but by the political and psychological and spiritual reality outside of its four walls which bring into question the sanity not merely the legitimacy of the entire procedure. In New York the words “In God We Trust” is still bolted to many court room walls and for good reason. When in the course of sentencing harden criminals to a life behind bars someone’s authority above that of man must be present for no one has a care about the rituals and ceremonies of a lynching.

In New York City for instance the request by the Catholic League to the Empire State Building to honor the colors of the Virgin Mary, blue and white which Mother Teresa honored this August 26 atop the ESB was denied.

Why would Mother Teresa be denied other than the values she espoused were contrary to those of Anthony Malkin the building owner? She was not denied on secular grounds as she was a Noble prize winner, not even on the grounds that she was Catholic. Were that the case some one could argue that even in service to God and the Church during the course of her life Catholic or otherwise as a person she made admiral accomplishments. It certainly in this day and age no testimony to sexism or xenophobia. It has to be therefore because of the values she espoused devotion to the Holy Mother and her personal devotion to the “poorest of the poor”. Certainly if Mr. Malkin held her dedication in esteem he would have no problem with the request. Fundamentally it is the irony of many evils found in humanity, when many see none in the other. Such is the case in abortion, Terri Schivo and others seen as worthless.

This departure from what many Catholics may have felt deviated from a historical appreciation and general acceptance in New York City came to a crashing halt in declining the Catholic Leagues request. Yet, for some time charity has not prevailed in New York City for Catholics and historically it never has. We were fooled into believing so because many of us believed the entire city had reminisced of Christmas tree smells, silver bells and had sugar dumplings dancing in their heads around Christmas. Or that they enjoyed the peaceful abode of a local parish or Cathedral as they came in from a rain soaked city street. Or perhaps were familiar with the slight embarrassment of getting all dressed in those shiny, silky clothes for Easter which made one stand out, that set you apart from the others that day. Slowly but surely Christmas, Easter all revoked from Christianity and especially the Catholics. There is no need to say Merry Christmas in the department store because not everyone is Christian or because it was originally a Pagan practice and nevertheless what is Christmas other than a pleasant convention to purchase goods and talk sentimentally about loving others in a spiritual and not necessarily religious way?

We believed they would treat us like the original godfather, they like all loyal subjects would come and kiss our ring. After all so much of what it means to be Catholic today lies in the past. However they are not loyal subjects of the Pope nor very often for that matter are many Catholics. Yet this separation of Church and private interest was a wake up call for Catholics and non-Catholics alike. Here in New York City we have identified our respective corners and feign no shame in espousing our disdain for Catholics. The equally resentful disdain for Muslims and Jews are only curtailed through politics and other necessities but that facade is crumbling as well. America today is anti-religious which the Protestant themselves espouse, all that is needed is a personal relationship with God. Religious freedom which is the freedom to openly profess ones religion and still be respected as a fellow citizen be damned. The central question of gay marriage proposal lead by the openly gay U.S Congressman Barney Frank was “How would a gay couple effect anyone’s life?. The very ignorance of how demonstrates the error of the homosexual mentality, that we all live separately in a Ganymede tower denying the fact that indeed we are all interdependent.The very proposition alone suggesting we unravel the tissue of society, Holy matrimony, has done exactly that. The rootless mind of the proud will in no time determine heterosexuals to be their inferiors, as stupid, when all along this perception that they share that “this” is like “that” when nothing further could be true changes the values in addition to the variables of the equation and they fail to function. The truth being that two men do not make one whole, no man is sexually attracted to another unless he idolizes himself in the other and as such is considered a psychometric invert, psycho metrics because mans mental energy can be measured. While a man’s mental energy can be plowed into the body of a woman who is meant to have a gravitational pull on mans mental energy, garnering her the unflattering homage as the “ol’ ball and chain”. Two men will merely fly away lost in sentiment and conceit.

Taken a step further all that a secularist demands is the freedom to do what they want to do.They do not need God and or religion. All they need is reason and desire, man, money and material and they can build a paradise on Earth. Rather one could perceive this change in State through Catholic eyes as the end of the world as we know it and maybe not “…feel fine” about it but with fear and trembling working our way to accept it. There is no fear of hell for these people and there was none for Abby Sunderland.

Many Americans are lost at sea in much the same way as Abby Sunderland. Especially the “collapsed Catholic” or rather the Catholic insurgents. Those who have lost the faith have been the most virulent opponents of the Church today. They are demons like pedophile Catholic priests and sensationalist seeking editors found at leading news agencies, working in tandem with the pedophiles to scandalized the Church and shaking away many of the unsteady from their hopes of eternal salvation. They have allied themselves with the atheist and the “Masonic” New World Order builders, who have planned a global secularist socialism future where everything will be great and no one will be restricted. It is a “Brave New World” and the Americans sent sixteen year old Abby Sunderland to prove it. Reminiscent of seventeenth century European royals who ruled nations by Abby’s age except most of them died in their thirties through murder or some currently curable disease.

Who would put their daughter at sea at sixteen years old? Who would ask of such a thing from their young teenage daughter? Abby Sunderland did not make it around the world this time she was rescued at sea by the Australian and French controlled Reunion Island naval forces, God bless her. Americans though are also in need of rescue but to whom will they turn? Public relations men on behalf of the Empire State Building said that if they honored Mother Teresa the ESB would be compelled to honor all the religions. The Church has grounds to ask for a clarification of this statement after ten years of war with radical Islamist whether a discernment can not yet be made between Catholicism and other religions. Perhaps this is too much to ask since the Bishops themselves are perceived as employees of the Vatican and the Pope. Such perception that would hold the current day Pope responsible for the Holy Inquisition and the Crusades would not admit to even original sin assigned by God in order to hold everyone to account. Should not a man of eighty not hold himself guilty for what he did when two years old? Is it not more reasonable that a man who would not atone for his own sins much more for those he has forgotten be held accountable for sins he himself has committed rather than to persecute a man and hold him responsible for historical epochs bulleted recently in a “memo” printed in a nation wide publication? Should the Pope be held accountable for activities that took place hundreds of years before he was even born? The animus for the Pope like that of Isrealy’s begs the question whether this unquenchable hatred has anything to do with the Pope Benedict XVI Joseph Ratzinger was a German national conscripted into the N.A.Z.I party and served as a soldier? Is there an unquenchable hatred amongst atheistic Semites for the German Pope?

At the same time this animus reveals that the devil knows Pope Benedict XVI is a formidable Pope, he is held accountable not merely for the one billion Catholics alive now but for the billions that have come before. The Pope is not Jesus Christ, certainly he would be the first one to tell anyone that. Pope Benedict XVI finished his eighth book before the Church child sex scandal was even over. The administration of one billion people is not enough the devil now wants him to atone for the billions that have come before him. Then tell him that he cant do it, it is impossible. The realm of unpardonable sins in which he lives precludes this simple proposition and yet it is the kernel of the Christian religion. Seeing the Pope atone for sins of his fellow priest he believes that he is petitioning him and if not he than whom? In a country like America where the first book put in print can not be read in our educational facilities how then can these same judge the Church? From where will they start when they know nothing of religion? Dear Abby, were you ever given a Bible to navigate your course over these seas?